Title: Extra information about the chinese tech tree
KnowYourEnemy - January 16, 2009 12:19 PM (GMT)
Hey you guys, a while ago we released both tech trees for the factions in the game, you will all have read them already, but since most of you aren't really specialists in chinese vehicles (I wasn't before I became a reasearcher here) I made a picture with photo's from eatch vehicle we have put in there
I'ts a really big pic so I'm not going to post the image directly in the thread just click on the
link to watch it
I have done the same thing for the amerrican tech trees and I have put some pics from our models in it too
click
here to watch it
Blaze302 - January 17, 2009 12:36 AM (GMT)
Looks like this is going to be an awesome mod.
tyrunner - January 20, 2009 06:51 AM (GMT)
KnowYourEnemy - January 20, 2009 03:11 PM (GMT)
I dug up an old render that wasn't released yet, it's the type 99 main battle tank
tyrunner - January 23, 2009 09:08 AM (GMT)
There are some wrong with 99 tank
like this

KnowYourEnemy - January 23, 2009 10:08 AM (GMT)
can you point out where the difference is, because I don't see it
tyrunner - January 23, 2009 01:57 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (KnowYourEnemy @ Jan 23 2009, 10:08 AM) |
| can you point out where the difference is, because I don't see it |
sorry :)

BTW i'm come from chinese a coh player ;)
KnowYourEnemy - January 23, 2009 02:07 PM (GMT)
If you are referring to the difference on the cage with the reactive armor that's around the back of the turret, we based us on
this picture, and there are different turrets for the type 99
do you speak chinese?
tyrunner - January 23, 2009 04:59 PM (GMT)
1:Oh i see
in china so many people was hope the modern combat mod release as soon as possible ;)
2:Yes i do :rolleyes:
KnowYourEnemy - January 24, 2009 02:34 PM (GMT)
tyrunner, check your personnal messages, I have a favor I need to ask
tyrunner - January 24, 2009 06:30 PM (GMT)
Oh i see it
No problem, i will find they as soon as possible,but it will take me some time
Chucknorris - January 25, 2009 08:17 AM (GMT)
So good to know that this mod is still alive and kicking.
and i'm glad to see another fellow chinese here.
But that 'militia squad" thing for chinese??? That's definely not cool
gamer_1001 - March 20, 2009 03:24 PM (GMT)
Nice mod, but there are somethings I like to point out with the Chinese tech tree.
First, isn't
PAP (Chinese paramilitary police) act as first line of defence for the Chinese in the real world? It would make more sense if the militia unit is changed to PAP. just a cosmetic and name swap. Given PAP is composed of both second line militia like units to elite commando teams, this change would also open the option to upgrade PAP units to better anti-infantry units at late game (like volk) should a Chinese player decide to skip tier 2.
Second, given the Chinese tech tree is revolved around the "armor fist" theme, can we change the Type 81 MLRS to
PHZ89 MLRS? Both uses the same rocket, but PHZ89 MLRS just looked much cooler and fits the "armor fist" theme a lot better.
Anyway, cheers and keep up the good work.
gamer_1001 - March 21, 2009 04:40 AM (GMT)
The "Soldier" name is just too stiff for the Chinese regular infantry, so I did some digging to see if a better term can be used.
By my knowledge, all Chinese infantries are classified as motorized infantry or mechanized infantry units. According to the defination
here, and given that Chinese tier 2 does not come with tanks or IFVs, thus the regular Chinese infantry in the mod are not mechanized infantry by Chinese classification...
Can we rename "Soldier" to the Chinese name "Motorized Infantry" or the Soviet WWII term "Motor Rifle"? Just a name change, nothing fancy.
OnkelSam - March 21, 2009 08:21 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (gamer_1001 @ Mar 20 2009, 03:24 PM) |
..... Second, given the Chinese tech tree is revolved around the "armor fist" theme, can we change the Type 81 MLRS to PHZ89 MLRS? Both uses the same rocket, but PHZ89 MLRS just looked much cooler and fits the "armor fist" theme a lot better.
.... |
That's actually an interesting idea. We will discuss this internally. Thanks for your input